The short answer

DF 2.1 is an oversized L.A.B. Golf mallet built around Lie Angle Balance. Its unusual shape still has to suit your aim, pace and posture.

DF 2.1 is the distinctive oversized putter that established L.A.B. Golf’s visual identity. Its broad CNC-milled aluminium head combines the company’s Lie Angle Balance construction with a prominent alignment frame.

Balance and construction

The manufacturer describes DF 2.1 as a Lie Angle Balanced model intended to reduce torque on the face during the stroke. Its current stock product page says the head is CNC milled from 6061 aluminium and pairs the stock build with a Press II 3 Degree grip.

Why the shape matters

DF 2.1 has a large, unconventional footprint. That can offer a strong alignment picture for some golfers and too much visual information for others. Its appearance alone does not establish forgiveness or accuracy for an individual.

Fit the putter

Length and lie must suit comfortable posture. Grip geometry and shaft position also influence the intended setup. If buying used, verify the measured build and ask about cutting, bending, grip replacement or reshafting.

Test the result

Use short putts for aim and start line, then longer putts for pace. Compare against a current putter and a more compact L.A.B. shape if available. The company offers remote fitting; for in-person putter fitting in Randwick, contact Fix It Golf.

Compare centre and off-centre contact

During a fitting, ask to identify where the ball meets the face and compare the finishing distances of ordinary strikes. Repeat from the same starting point with your current putter. If one head gives a tighter pace pattern, check whether the improvement persists when you alternate clubs. This is a useful practical comparison of the manufacturer’s off-centre consistency claim. The family comparison helps position DF 2.1 against smaller heads, and the fitting guide covers lie and grip setup.

Decision checkpoint: Include the head’s very different visual footprint in the assessment. A golfer who consistently aims it well and controls pace has useful evidence; novelty alone is neither a benefit nor a fault.

Back to the journal